It’s no longer new to us how the left use censorship all the time especially during this COVID-19 pandemic, they always use the COVID virus to censor people while telling “It’s for your health.”
And the same as the Patriot Act they always say that “It’s for your security.” And just recently they have been using this censoring kick big time. And this time it’s even worst and more tyrannical than that was.
During this administration, once you’re against their narrative you’ll be called “anti-vaxx” or “disinformation.” They no longer allow debates they will automatically approve the things that only fit their narrative.
For them not following and disagreeing with Fauci is also going against SCIENCE since Fauci is Science for them.
Is this how a healthy and free society should work?
Every story always has its two sides, and you shouldn’t listen to only one side, you should be able to hear and know the other side two in order to get an accurate and detailed story. The way we actually progress and move forward is with healthy debate. And right now that’s not being allowed.
It’s the “regime’s way” or the highway, type attitude and that’s not sitting well with many people, as you can imagine.
That’s not the American spirit or how we’re used to doing things.
This is what happened to Chelsea Clinton who made a Twitter post in a “communist-style” censorship for doctors and others who were discussing vaccine content and issues that differed from the “regime’s narrative” she faced instant backlash.
She also shared an article from the uber left-wing “The Guardian” which claims “anti-vaxx grifters” are making a fortune.
Here’s what she said:
“Anti-vaxx grift going strong – why is Substack facilitating science denialists’ ability to profit from destructive lies (and comfortable profiting themselves)? “Anti-vaxxers making ‘at least $2.5m’ a year from publishing on Substack”
Anti-vaxx grift going strong – why is Substack facilitating science denialists’ ability to profit from destructive lies (and comfortable profiting themselves)?
“Anti-vaxxers making ‘at least $2.5m’ a year from publishing on Substack” via @guardian https://t.co/FBc6IkzVXa— Chelsea Clinton (@ChelseaClinton) January 27, 2022
Below are what people have been saying online:
“Chelsea Clinton complaining about independent journalists ie ~anti-vaxxers~ collectively earning $2.5m a year on SubStack is rich considering the tens of millions her family foundation plundered from earthquake recovery efforts in Haiti”
“I’d rather sit through a lecture on proper food storage techniques by Jeffrey Dahmer than have to read another attempt by Chelsea to compose a moral position on grifting.”
“Big Pharma made over $60,000,000,000 last year and have had to slowly admit that much of the so called science they’ve been giving us was wrong. Who are the real grifters?”
“Clinton Foundation should open their books if they’re going to go around making accusations.”
“How Much Has Pfizer Made?????? #PeakAnnoyanceFactor 🤣🤣🤣”
“Speaking of grift, how’s that fourth shot coming along?”
She’s always been known for always putting her foot in her mouth online.
It happens quite often, and I can see she’s still at it.
This spoiled and entitled girl never learned her lesson, well time will surely come she’ll be serving her own karma.
Source: Wayne Dupree