Poll monitors testified last year that boxes of mail-in ballots for Joe Biden looked liked they’d been run through a photocopy machine, state investigators quietly broke the seal on one suspicious box and inspected the hundreds of votes it contained for signs of fraud, RealClearInvestigations has learned exclusively.
Real Clear Investigation reported:
After several Fulton County, Ga., poll monitors testified last year that boxes of mail-in ballots for Joe Biden looked liked they’d been run through a photocopy machine, state investigators quietly broke the seal on one suspicious box and inspected the hundreds of votes it contained for signs of fraud, RealClearInvestigations has learned exclusively.
At the same time, a key whistleblower told RCI that state investigators pressured her to recant her story about what she and other poll monitors had observed — what they called unusually “pristine” mail-in ballots while sorting through them during last November’s hand recount.
“I felt I was under investigation,” said Suzi Voyles, a longtime Fulton County poll manager whose affidavits have been used by election watchdogs to sue the county for access to the ballots in question.
Although the ballots are at the center of disputes about the Georgia presidential race, which Joe Biden won by just 12,000 votes, the state never disclosed its probe to the public or to election watchdogs suing to inspect the ballots.
State officials also neglected to inform the judge hearing the lawsuit that they were conducting such an inspection, even though the judge had issued a protective order over the ballots in January. In a nine-page amicus brief recently filed in the case, attorneys for the office of Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger urged Superior Court Judge Brian Amero to deny petitioners’ requests to inspect the ballots, calling them a “fishing expedition.”
Frances Watson, a chief investigator for the secretary of state’s office, confirmed in a statement to RCI that she sent investigators to Fulton County earlier this year to inspect the batches of sealed ballots. Poll monitors involved in last November’s hand recount had described the mail-in ballots in affidavits as devoid of creases and folds and featuring identically bubbled-in marks for Biden. But the state said it could not find any ballots matching that description.
Did Raffensperger and his gang go back and unseal and open the boxes on all ballots identified by-election poll helpers and watchers and make changes to those ballots identified in pristine condition by folding them and placing them back in the box?’
Ryan Germany, Raffensperger’s Attorney was aware of fraudulent activities on Election Night yet decided against providing this information on a phone call with the President.
We also now know that despite having a report disclosing egregious election issues in Fulton County, Raffensperger claimed the 2020 Election in Georgia was safe and secure.
However; in May, Raffensperger, knowing all that was wrong, stated he welcomed a forensic audit of the state.
So why there’s a sudden change with the Raffensperger tune? Was this because he knew all issues with pristine ballots were addressed? Did he know those lacking folds were illegally ‘fixed’ during the ‘secret investigation’ that occurred per Sperry’s report?