New Biden Rule DIRECTLY Targeting Your Wives And Daughters!


You ever see someone do something that they think is going to do some good and it ends up backfiring on them in spectacular fashion?

Oh sure, just about every time someone makes a rule that they think is going to make life better for someone else it ends up making it worse for someone else.

Now, I can tell you from the couple of times that I have been pulled over in my life that there is always that wonder of, even though you know that you did nothing wrong that they might find something that you did wrong. Before you start saying that cops never pull people over for no reason….we all know that isn’t entirely accurate. That being said, at least before this new Biden rule, they were pulling people over at random for no reason.

The Biden administration has endorsed the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, a sweeping police “reform” bill intended to fight “systemic racism” in police departments.

The House approved HR 1280, introduced by California Democratic Rep. Karen Bass, on Wednesday. A similar bill was passed by the House last year, but it stalled in the Senate. The new bill could face the same fate.

The legislation was named after the black man who died in police custody last May after a Minneapolis officer knelt on his neck for nearly nine minutes. Floyd’s death triggered the demonstrations and deadly riots that spread throughout the U.S. last summer.

Washington lawyer Hans Bader analyzed HR 1280 in an article published on the legal blog Liberty Unyielding.

Bader said it “could lead to more racial and sexual profiling, such as gender-based stops of female motorists” and “could actually cause systematic racism and sexism.” (Emphasis added.)

According to Bader, this bill “encourages police departments to adopt quotas based on gender and race for ‘traffic stops,’ ‘pedestrian stops,’ and ‘interviews.’ The practical effect would be to encourage police departments to stop innocent women, Asians, and whites, just to meet quotas based on gender and race. If police departments don’t meet these quotas, they could be sued by the Justice Department or individuals they stop.”

Sound fair?

Moreover, “Section 311 of the Act forbids what it calls ‘racial profiling.’ This is defined to include not just race, but also ‘gender’ in Section 302(a)(6) of the bill. But it defines ‘profiling’ in such a crudely-mechanical way that it actually encourages profiling, rather than outlawing it,” he said.

Bader explained that “under the bill, what matters is numbers and racial bean-counting, not actual racism or sexism. ‘Disparate impact’ in police stops or interviews based on race or gender — for example, stopping more men than women, or interviewing more blacks than Asians or whites — is defined as ‘prima facie evidence’ of a ‘violation.’

Read More