We know that globalists and other progressives are bound and determined to get us eating bugs, but we’re not eating bugs, and we’re not eating each other. But New York Times said we will…
“Cannibalism has a time and a place.”
Those are exact words of the New York Times clickbait title for its recent tweet.
Yes, mainstream media is now attempting to normalize cannibalism.
I mean, seriously? This is the dreck published by one of the most historically important newspapers in the country. Granted, that train left the station a long time ago, but still.
It gets even more disturbing after that. “A spate of recent stomach-churning books, TV shows, and films suggests we’ve never looked so delicious — to one another,” they report breathlessly.
Well, if you don’t believe it, check it out:
Here’s what ‘The New York Times’ tweeted on July 23:
“Cannibalism has a time and a place. Some recent books, films, and shows suggest that the time is now. Can you stomach it?”
Cannibalism has a time and a place. Some recent books, films and shows suggest that the time is now. Can you stomach it? https://t.co/JzU1QRPYxV
— The New York Times (@nytimes) July 23, 2022
Chad Prather reacted to the Times’ twisted fantasy of eating human flesh:
NY Times: A taste for cannibalism. #Cannibalism pic.twitter.com/qQIhIebNdQ
— Chad Prather (@WatchChad) July 23, 2022
when the people realize what’s going on behind the scenes… they will be 100% shocked… #canibalism #adenochrome #sextrafficking #monarchyHunting #dumbs https://t.co/QDDPgSBos6
— João Carlos (@joaocarlooo) July 23, 2022
More details of this report from Fox News:
Twitter users expressed discomfort and confusion on Twitter Saturday after The New York Times published an article claiming there’s a “time and a place” for “cannibalism.”
Users blasted the piece for seemingly “normalizing” the grisly practice of eating human flesh.
The New York Times published the outlandish piece, titled “A Taste for Cannibalism?” in its Style section on Saturday. Written by Alex Beggs, the article provided insight into cannibalism’s growing relevance in pop culture – especially in a “spate of recent stomach-churning books” – and touted one author’s assertion that cannibalism’s “time is now.”
Beggs began her piece with a reference to novelist Chelsea G. Summers’ story idea of a character eating her deceased boyfriend’s “liver served Tuscan style, on toast.” She then observed, “Turns out, cannibalism has a time and a place. In the pages of some recent stomach-churning books, and on television and film screens, Ms. Summers and others suggest that that time is now.”
‘Outkick’ noted in its reporting that “The New York Times, once the gold standard of journalism, is now a monumental joke. And that goes for all sections of the outlet, from “news” to op-ed to politics to cannibalism.”
Sputnik News shared memes blasting The New York Times for attempting to normalize cannibalism.
Cannibalism is just the latest wicked, demonic practice pushed onto the public by the media:
They are grooming humanity for their sick AI agenda.
It will not happen! Humanity will NOT tolerate canibalism, paedophilia, murder or any such sick practices!
THANK GOODNESS YHE MAJORITY OF PAEDOS SEX TRAFFICKERS LUCIFERIANS NOW NOOSED!
The rest will pay same price too! https://t.co/uYZFi5AO8C
— AxtroMagic (@AxtroMagic) July 28, 2022
The world, global “elites” plan for us is worst than Sodom & Gomorrah. Pedofilia, Canibalism, Pansexualism, genderless, trans., ..Everything they want us to accept as normal. Humanity, how long more can we stand this humiliation? pic.twitter.com/witx3A4O01
— Julija (@Julija9j) July 23, 2022
Unsurprisingly, the media wants you to think cannibalism will help save the planet and fight non-existent climate change:
You think ‘canibalism’ appeared in the news this year? pic.twitter.com/HD5LxFk7h9
— 108A (@108SAR) July 26, 2022
‘Big Think’ gives us more details of this sadistic story:
A Swedish scientist has caused a stir by advocating that in order to stem the ill effects of climate changes, humans need to start eating each other. Of course, he’s not calling for all-out cannibalism like it used to be practiced throughout history. Rather he thinks that if we just get over some very obvious taboos, we might consider eating human corpses.
While talking about the Gastro Summit focused on “food on the future” on Swedish TV, the behavioral scientist and marketing strategist Magnus Söderlund from the Stockholm School of Economics proposed that in order to truly take on the effects of climate change, we must “awake the idea” that eating human flesh should be discussed as an option in the future.
Söderlund used his tv interview on the State Swedish Television channel TV4 to give a powerpoint presentation entitled “Can you Imagine Eating Human Flesh?” It included such topics as “Is Cannibalism the solution to food sustainability in the future?” and “Are we humans too selfish to live sustainably?”
What bothers me about the NY Times cannibalism piece is more the unbridled joy they take in the subject and the unspoken but apparent way they actually promote the practice.
Sources: WLT, The New York Times, Big Think, Outkick, Sputnik News
dan